Above is the video of Ann Clywd MP raising the issue of insurance companies and their part in covering up child sexual abuse in yesterday evening’s Adjournment Debate. The involvement of insurance companies in this issue takes many forms and Ann Clwyd refers to a few examples in her speech. With permission from Teresa Cooper, who very unusually for a survivor has a wealth of documented evidence of her own abuse, I want to give the reader an example of how the influence of insurance companies has been used to prevent survivors of abuse from getting justice.
This example dates from when Teresa was 16 years old when she had been placed in foster care but Teresa also has documented evidence of sexual abuse she suffered when she was below that age while at Kendall House.
For legal reasons I’ve redacted the surname of the foster carers but it should be noted that the record shows that previous to Teresa’s allegation other children who had been placed with this couple had made similar allegations of abuse against the male foster carer, Brian T, and that subsequent to his conviction much later following a complaint made by another girl, Wandsworth Council ceased placing children with him. The assault took place in 1984 and was reported to Wandsworth Social Services and Kent police at the time and Teresa has documented medical evidence of the assault from the time due of the physical injuries she sustained as a result of this incident. However, much of the documentation that I’m using here is from the early 1990s when Teresa again sought justice.
What you’ll note on reading these extracts is that Wandsworth Social Services attempted to discredit Teresa Cooper.
There seems to be a ‘plan’. Wandsworth Social Services will let Kent police investigate and when they find there a “lack of evidence” Teresa will be discredited and shown to be a fantasist.
Unfortunately for Wandsworth Social Services, the big problem with this ‘plan’ is that there isn’t a “lack of evidence”. So how do Wandsworth Social Services overcome this problem ?
They deny Kent police access to the evidence.
And why do Wandsworth Social Services want to do this ?
I’d just like to thank Teresa for allowing me to share this with you. I hope it will help readers to understand why the influence of insurance companies is such an issue in the debate regarding CSA.
I’ve no doubt whatsoever that this clear and documented example is far from isolated.
theneedleblog 
From experience I assume the Insurance Company was ZURICH MUNICIPLE part of ZURICH INSURANCE the then ZFS group and parent company. During the period 2003 to 2008 this bunch of gangsters destroyed the Worlds economy directly causing most of the financial crisis, and was later fined $billions for bid rigging. Then insolvent it was bailed out and taken over by the U.S. Government.
I understand they are now trading again as a new entity after paying off U.S. Gov Bailout, “sorry taxpayers money!
“Be Warned” when you need insurance, (ASK WHO IS ULTIMATE PARENT COMPANY) i.e. who owns the Insurer.
Regards GF
Reblogged this on L8in.
Reblogged this on Armor Of God Foundation.
Satanic Witch? or Which Satanic?
“Out-and-out” Satanic? or “So-called” Satanic?
You decide which is witch:
Looking at more disinfo from McKenzie Friends – and there’s lots more of it IF you CARE to look – which is designed to give the impression the videos of the children were first released in February 2015:
FACT: Kurjo FIRST leaked the videos December 15th, after she “had been sitting on this horrific case ever since early November”( so after “sitting on the case” for a month) – and NOT sitting on the case from November 2014 until “February this year” (quotes from McKenzie).
FACT: Kurjo leaked these videos to a “blogger” – remember Kurjo is a computer expert, with multiple blogs herself (check out McNeill’s connection to The CERN Project) – showing the children’s faces without asking ella’s consent. Kurjo did it SECRETLY, without even TELLING the mother. Why? Did she tell McKenzie (who knows which witch is witch, but only when she wants)? ella EXPRESSLY asked McKenzie Friends NOT to make ANY of the documents/videos public. The deliberate leak in December last year, and again in February this year, was/is a BETRAYAL of trust, a BETRAYAL of confidence – and the Satanist’s motto is: “Betrayal is the Greater Good.”
Check out at the video: “Hampstead Cover Up Interview With Ella Abe Who Expose the sodomite Death Cult” around 12:30mins: https://youtu.be/aPCYzCP6rqM or the latest “World Beyond Belief “ interview with ella and abe https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fol2zfc2x_Y (starting around,1:08mins) – both here on this blog, at the TOP July 11th .
And in the Satanic Witch McKenzie’s latest video offering outside the Royal Courts of Justice(also on this blog), she refers to ELLA’s children as “The Hampstead Children”, or “Barnet Council Foster-Care children”- she can’t even form the words of TRUTH: ELLA’S CHILDREN, in her mouth. And of course, witch that she is, she manipulates words to manipulate the truth.
McKenzie says she is “slightly out of touch with the family at the moment”, but she doesn’t add the reason for this is because “the family” know she is in NO WAY to be trusted. Still we get to find out how brave McKenzie is by her saying “good afternoon” to a fellow coven member. And what would we do without that titillating tit-bit of info that Pauffley is: “quite a tall lady … about 6ft tall with her heels”. So read: tall, sexy lady, instead of someone who is a KNOWN liar and fraud, someone who enables paedo-sadistic rapists, torturers and murderers to roam around free (at the very least). We see this vile creature who has helped to imprison two innocent children, putting them in the clutches of their attackers, called “a lady”. Pauffley, an unspeakably wretched specimen, who subjects a family – gabriel, alisa, ella and abe – to such a sadistic cruel ordeal, greeted as your “ladyship”?
How right ella and abe are NOT to trust you one jot, Belinda McKenzie – they can see right through you and that vampire Kurjo – and so can I now.
With McKenzie Friends – Who Needs Enemies?
They are deceivers, plain and simple.
I wonder, is there a law against an organisation deliberately destroying evidence of criminal behaviour by its employees? What about a company advising an organisation to destroy such evidence?
Times article 1994
http://www.no2abuse.com/index.php/articles/comments/times-article-1994-wandsworth-council-blocks-rape-inquiry
Wandsworth council blocks rape inquiry
I always feel it’s a pity that this issue seems to have also been latched onto as a ‘cause’ by an unsavoury array of vile and deranged far-right neo-nazi conspiracy theorist bloggers over the internet. I’m thinking in particular of the Chris Spivey site which regularly brings up these issues but also uses it as an attempt to ‘illustrate’ their paranoid racist, anti-Semitic, homophobic, sexist and transphobic views. There’s even outright holocaust denial on his site and you know we’re talking the far-side of crazy when someone also believes the Boston bombings, Tunisia Shootings and murder of Lee Rigby were elaborate hoaxes!
Whilst such self-advertising haters and cyberbullies continue to hijack legitimate concerns such as child abuse etc. anyone wishing to cover up such wrongdoing can easily point to anyone who delves into this subject as belonging to the far-right bigot lobby. At the risk of turning paranoid myself, I often wonder whether these sites are set-up to deliberately discredit genuine child abuse campaigners.
There’s an old saying, that when you get flak, you’re over the target.
Cerberus, your comment is pure 100% gold plated flak.
I tend to agree with Alan, Cerberus. Whilst being a Nice Jewish Girl I similarly detest holocaust deniers like Spivey he still has a right to his own opinion after all – no matter how much yourself, Alan, myself or the rest of us on here are offended by it. Yes, it’s inevitable that you will get the loonies and bigots with ulterior political agendas jumping on the bandwagon, but I believe the majority of people have more intelligence to tell the difference between them and us than you give them credit for. It’s the internet after all. It would be no use to ban these nuts as they’d only go underground,
I’m sure someone has the info but wasn’t one the inquiries into North Wales effectively scuppered due to direction/influence of the insurance company?
The Jillings Report. Ann Clwyd refers to it in her speech.
Reblogged this on adeybob's Blog and commented:
Please read this very well presented anatomical break-down of the role insurance companies play, in the horrific comedy of Child Sexual Abuse coverups.
On another note, I am hoping that this breakthrough collaboration, between Needleblog and the inestimable Mz Cooper, heralds a new and insistent phase for many other collaborations to come, on Needleblog and many other blogs.
Let’s see if this is picked up by the red-top rags…or by the re-branded Daily Fail.
I can’t let my post go without this personal note…
…many won’t realise, but I can guess it, but the result of this collaboration on Needleblog only comes after a lot of groundwork and very close communication; something I would like to elaborate on, given the proper permissions from all parties.
shocking and horrible and as you say one example of a huge problem.
the suppression of the jilling’s report is probably a multi thread example of insurance companies mitigating liabilities.
the destruction of records is a parallel aspect to the refusal to provide them and ranges from the “we dont keep anything after x years”to “destroyed in a fire at a storage companies warehouse” and includes thousands of relevant examples of denial and cover up for fiscal reasons and to protect the incompetent and/or the guilty.
i have much respect for ms cooper and others who are willing to speak out and seek justice not just for themselves but for those unable to speak out.