Janner: Unfit To Stand Trial – Still Eligible To Legislate

Untitled

Lord Janner is unfit to stand trial over child sexual abuse offences dating back 50 years, a High Court judge has ruled.

Mr JuBBC Newsstice Openshaw told the Old Bailey the 87-year-old peer had “advanced and disabling dementia”.

Both prosecution and defence barristers had agreed at a previous hearing that Greville Janner was not well enough to take part in a criminal trial.

Lord Janner faces 22 counts of sex offences against boys.

Greville Janner was made Lord Janner of Braunstone in 1997. He remains a life peer, but has been on leave of absence since 2014. He was suspended from the Labour Party in April.

BBC News

Advertisements

21 Comments

Filed under Abuse, News, Politics

21 responses to “Janner: Unfit To Stand Trial – Still Eligible To Legislate

  1. Pingback: Janner: Unfit To Stand Trial – Still Eligible To Legislate | Alternative News Network

  2. Typical the rich always believe they are above the law not fit to stand but fit to legislate what a load of bullshit start getting real with these people the law wants to start getting hard with these people I wonder what would happen if it was one of his children or grandchildren but then again wouldn’t let the bastard near my children I would search seek castrate no problems here disgusting.

  3. Anon

    Looks like there’s nothing positive anyone can say about this situation.

  4. So you think its alright to molest and rape a child and get away with it pray to god it never happens to your children or grandchildren you may have a different view then no the rich think they can get away with bloody everything total waste of space in society.

  5. nuggy

    all been very quite lately

  6. Why not post regarding the latest ‘CSA Inquiry’ news?… any child abuse campaigner cannot place any CSA crime above another… Rochdale and predominantly ‘Asian grooming gangs’, accusations against both Catholic and C of E (CHURCH OF ENGLAND!) institutions… NOT PLACED ABOVE ANY OTHER CHILD ABUSE ALLEGATIONS!…

    The Inquiry is STILL going after British Security Services (Special Branch, MI5, MI6… Andrew Younger in the ‘DICKENS DOSSIER’…. I apologise to ALL survivors of child abuse… but the involvement of the Security Services was the most important aspect for us…. you cannot realistically combat ANY form of child abuse, unless the Govt is realistic in combatting it… THE SECURITY SERVICES (MI5/MI6) ARE THE KEY…

    ‘Official Secrets Act’

    • dpack

      imho elements of security services ,both uk and international, as well as a variety of “others”, both domestic and international, are one bunch of keys to understanding context and thereby unravelling truth with “telescope and microscope” regarding some aspects of organised csa and the power generated by the exploitation of that organisation.

      regarding silence at times it is wise to be silent and at times to be loud .

      an outline overview of the “state of play” and “rules of engagement” about the current situation could be useful to those who should know they are not forgotten and to those who are working to ensure they are not.

      at times i lose track of what should be avoided due to sub judice issues ,active inquiries,etc etc and at times wonder if some scrap of data that means nowt to me might be of use in a place i know nothing about.

      • dpack

        this afternoon it was suggested to me that sub judice only applies to new information regarding ongoing (or investigations expected to lead to) legal proceedings and does not apply to information that is in the public domain and even if that information is presented in a way that is intended to imply linkage sub judice does not apply.

        if the above is true i recon there is plenty of scope to assist in the search for truth regarding a variety of both detail and context as there is much information in the public domain.

        it might be best to get further legal advice about this.

      • Anon

        A pamphlet published 20 years ago about some alleged activities has been in the public domain on the Internet for quite some time now.

      • Jack

        Subjudice only applies when legal proceedings are pending or a court case is ongoing. Since the DPP have announced they are not proceeding against Greville Janner on charges of raping children then Subjudice no longer applies.

  7. dpack

    in that case the statement made by his chum uri geller on arrival in israel might be of some significance.

    http://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0LEViccvG1WJgIABdQPxQt.;_ylu=X3oDMTByMG04Z2o2BHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMQRjb2xvA2JmMQR2dGlkAw–/RV=2/RE=1450060956/RO=10/RU=http%3a%2f%2fwww.independent.co.uk%2farts-entertainment%2ffilms%2ffeatures%2furi-geller-psychic-spy-the-spoon-benders-secret-life-as-a-mossad-and-cia-agent-revealed-8659271.html/RK=0/RS=rqSdbJK2KxDOAAu1_ikkK51zrNM-

    geller is an illusionist/mentalist(in the technical sense of using psychological techniques to manipulate or “know” a person/s thought,or establish their information) and therefore anything he says should be treated with caution but in this statement he is responding to other folks assessment of some of his activities in the context of his “retirement” to israel.

    the best trick is to separate the smoke and mirrors that create what we are supposed to see from the mechanism and reveal the method and purpose behind the act.

    ps the frank beck aspects might be important on a more local scale.

    pps see also oysten and martin,which leads to another slab of worm cans (some better known than others) and back to the original slab regarding janner senior.
    as a small aside iirc a family member of a person involved with a well known “investigative website” (and via the same relationship to a another labour peer) seems to have been a (company ?)secretary in an oysten snr related enterprise.(as far as i am aware oysten jnr is of no interest).
    oysten snr’s chum hall also seems to have some interesting connections.

  8. Colin

    Dead now so what happens now