Yes, according to tomorrow’s Daily Mail… apparently.
Filed under Abuse, News, Politics
Explains why Simon D was cautioned to stick to decision of Director of Public Prosecution and steer clear of making any reference to a possible finding
He’s just as likely to face justice as Leon Brittan and Cyril Smith ever were. Once he pops his clogs the full truth will come out, im sure. But then it will be his family that will have to face the backlash. If Janner had any backbone he would either defend himself in court and prove his accusers wrong or hold his hands up and face the consequences. I cannot see either of those outcomes becoming reality.
Hi Gojam. I think you mean “Yes, …” instead of “Not …” ?
Just checking to see if you were awake. ;-)
Actually, to be honest I doubt he will but nevermind…
I expect he’ll be dead before any trial can start.
Pingback: Will Lord Janner Face Justice ? | Alternative News Network
No wonder Saunders looks smug
There’s something very unsavoury about that woman.
Not before time i say,he’s been at this deviant way of life for years,all of us in The care system in East Midlands no this as fact his name was everywhere in 70/80s i no i was in the so called care system at those times,
The thing that really stunk was the decision not to even have a trial of the facts. That was what swung it for me that cover-up was the name of the game. If this revolting old pervert ever sees the inside of a court, therefore, I’ll eat my hat.
No trial for Janner, he’ll leave on an El-Al flight or in a box before trial.
Did Alison Saunders have a leading part in “The League Of Gentlemen” ?
Her face seems familiar to me.
I think we should be told.
YES. She played Edward & Tubbs son..
Timsanders2013 LOL! That’s exactly what we thought! Glad someone else recognised her too! Lol again! x
Just Tubbs, I thought.
EXCLUSIVE from The Daily Mail! … Everyone knew weeks ago…
”Once he pops his clogs the full truth will come out”…. that’s being arranged! :D (November!)
The U-turn decision for a ‘Trial of Facts’ sets a legal precedent, which is important considering the number of ‘high level’ suspects involved in ‘historical child abuse’. Can the same be applied for deceased suspects? Possibly so… at least recently deceased suspects who where suspects in an ongoing investigation.
Reblogged this on Floating-voter.
it will be good to hear the evidence but what exactly does a trail of the facts mean.
It means this piece of dirt won’t be present and won’t be prosecuted. But the evidence the police have collected will be heard in court, reported upon, and hopefully lessons will be learned (some hopes!)
that’s not really much good because there wont be a defence counsel to put this evidence to scrutiny..
How do we know that Janner isn’t just a distraction to take certain people off the trail of a more widespread, much more powerful group?
answer is we don’t.
Never let the Doubt-Mongers confuse you. The Doubt-Mongers are working for all of the Janners, Brittans, Heaths, Bush Seniors etc