by | June 26, 2015 · 10:07 pm

Will Lord Janner Face Justice ?

Yes, according to tomorrow’s Daily Mail… apparently.

unnamed (4)

24 Comments

Filed under Abuse, News, Politics

24 responses to “Will Lord Janner Face Justice ?”

  1. artmanjosephgrech
    June 26, 2015 at 10:22 pm

    Explains why Simon D was cautioned to stick to decision of Director of Public Prosecution and steer clear of making any reference to a possible finding

  2. Bruce Goldfinch
    June 26, 2015 at 10:31 pm

    He’s just as likely to face justice as Leon Brittan and Cyril Smith ever were. Once he pops his clogs the full truth will come out, im sure. But then it will be his family that will have to face the backlash. If Janner had any backbone he would either defend himself in court and prove his accusers wrong or hold his hands up and face the consequences. I cannot see either of those outcomes becoming reality.

  3. Andy Barnett
    June 26, 2015 at 10:32 pm

    Hi Gojam. I think you mean “Yes, …” instead of “Not …” ?

  4. Pingback: Will Lord Janner Face Justice ? | Alternative News Network

  5. Reddan
    June 26, 2015 at 11:12 pm

    http://t.co/UjBBNlP8zF

    No wonder Saunders looks smug

  6. steve
    June 26, 2015 at 11:33 pm

    Not before time i say,he’s been at this deviant way of life for years,all of us in The care system in East Midlands no this as fact his name was everywhere in 70/80s i no i was in the so called care system at those times,

  7. Patrick
    June 27, 2015 at 12:18 am

    The thing that really stunk was the decision not to even have a trial of the facts. That was what swung it for me that cover-up was the name of the game. If this revolting old pervert ever sees the inside of a court, therefore, I’ll eat my hat.

  8. Sabre
    June 27, 2015 at 2:49 am

    No trial for Janner, he’ll leave on an El-Al flight or in a box before trial.

  9. timsanders2013
    June 27, 2015 at 10:01 am

    Did Alison Saunders have a leading part in “The League Of Gentlemen” ?
    Her face seems familiar to me.
    I think we should be told.

  10. shirlz007
    June 27, 2015 at 10:42 am

    EXCLUSIVE from The Daily Mail! … Everyone knew weeks ago…

    ”Once he pops his clogs the full truth will come out”…. that’s being arranged! :D (November!)

    The U-turn decision for a ‘Trial of Facts’ sets a legal precedent, which is important considering the number of ‘high level’ suspects involved in ‘historical child abuse’. Can the same be applied for deceased suspects? Possibly so… at least recently deceased suspects who where suspects in an ongoing investigation.

  11. joekano76
    June 27, 2015 at 10:43 am

    Reblogged this on Floating-voter.

  12. joekano76
    June 27, 2015 at 10:45 am

    Reblogged this on Floating-voter.

  13. nuggy
    June 27, 2015 at 7:32 pm

    it will be good to hear the evidence but what exactly does a trail of the facts mean.

    • Mark Hall
      June 27, 2015 at 11:03 pm

      It means this piece of dirt won’t be present and won’t be prosecuted. But the evidence the police have collected will be heard in court, reported upon, and hopefully lessons will be learned (some hopes!)

      • nuggy
        June 28, 2015 at 1:21 am

        that’s not really much good because there wont be a defence counsel to put this evidence to scrutiny..

  14. Becky
    June 27, 2015 at 11:20 pm

    How do we know that Janner isn’t just a distraction to take certain people off the trail of a more widespread, much more powerful group?