Experimenting On Children In Care

The Porton Down experiments on orphans clearly demonstrates the attitude of the Establishment toward children in care. To them children were disposable assets, just one step up from experimenting on animals.

But it would be naive to imagine that it was only military experiments in the name of national security that were undertaken. A Government like Margaret Thatcher’s in the 1980s which was extremely accommodating to private sector interests might wish to help pharmaceutical companies.

The questions raised by those in care that were very heavily medicated deserve answers.

At Kendall House,  where children were given cocktails of up to 11 different drugs including doses of valium 10 times the recommended  levels and where it would appear that controlled studies were being undertaken, with some girls receiving no medication while healthy girls receiving huge amounts is a case in point.

The Home Office consultant psychiatrist in charge of Kendall House, Dr Perinpanyagam was publicly criticised in the 1980s when this drugging regime was exposed and so it is interesting that Dr Perinpanyagam’s brother, also a doctor, should write in his defence in a report that the drugging regime was Government sanctioned.

Why ? Why would a government sanction the excessive medication of children ? Few might gain from it, only pharmaceuticals…

The allegations centre on at least four institutions where thousands of children are said to have been experimented upon in conditions described as “like something out of Auschwitz”.

It is alleged that Porton Down, the top secret military facility in Wiltshire, was involved in trialling drugs for use in the Cold War on youngsters who were regarded as “feeble-minded”.

One survivor told this newspaper he has obtained written and video evidence that he will pass to the public inquiry into historical abuse of children in care when it begins next year.

The man, now in his 50s, has been advised by lawyers to conceal his identity for his own safety until his full submission can be lodged at the inquiry announced by Scottish Education Secretary Angela Constance.

However, he was willing to divulge some of his intended testimony about the treatment he and others suffered.

The Express


Filed under Abuse, Kendall House, News, Politics

17 responses to “Experimenting On Children In Care

  1. paul


  2. BellaJI

    That is shocking.

  3. There is documentation about the tragic misuse of electroshock therapy and unethical drug experimentation on child patients, by psychiatrists such as Lauretta Bender, and the terrible harm done to them:
    H.P. Albarelli’s publications on these subjects are generally better grounded in verifiable reality and less contaminated by fantasies than some other authors. Nevertheless, I’ve noticed that unverifiable and/or blatantly false statements that originate with fraudulent mind-control victim claimants sometimes appear in his work. In the truth-out article linked above, there is a claim that Bender’s experiments were partially funded through the CIA front “Society for the Investigation of Human Ecology”, and a memo from TSD is quoted to support this idea. However, Lauretta Bender’s name doesn’t appear in the Josiah Macy Foundation participant lists reproduced in Colin Ross’ “The CIA Doctors”. I’ve never seen this alleged memo reproduced anywhere, or documentation that it existed. Colin Ross says there’s no evidence of Bender being financed by CIA, and in Albarelli’s own “A Terrible Mistake: The Murder of Frank Olson”, on page 285 he says: “It is not known if the CIA directly funded Bender’s experiments…” [There’s a hilarious bald-faced lie on page 288-289 of that book, I assume inserted by Albarelli’s editor/publisher: “The MKULTRA program funded drug experiments conducted by Aleister Crowley…” Crowley died in 1947, and MKULTRA was initiated in 1953, so that statement is obviously false.]

    The exploitation of children and unwitting adults as ‘guinea pigs’ for these inhuman historic experimentations was clearly a criminal violation of their human rights. Documented victims should be compensated and if those responsible are still alive they should be prosecuted.

    On the other hand, promoting the false idea that child abusers have in the past (and therefore, could in the present) use some formula or ‘program’ of sexual abuse & torture to create mind-controlled child super-slaves is grossly irresponsible, in my opinion. It’s NOT possible, (thankfully), because abuse will always have a destructive impact – never a constructive impact – on development. There are twisted sickos who would love to have their own child super-slave, we don’t need them being incited to actually TRY to make one – by people publicly parading false claims of: “Hey! It worked on me! I was a mind-controlled sex slave, porn model and prostitute – incapable of revealing my abuser’s secrets – with multiple personas performing specialized talents like drug mule and assassin. And here’s how MY abusers turned me into that, in graphic detail…”

  4. arthur billings

    my father in W W 2 worked at porton down and he never got over what he saw there , from experiments on captured german soldiers etc but we are still being brainwashed.
    before Christmas a large van marked OMEG was stopped and searched at random coming across the channel and inside were matresses with 7 boys aged between 10 and 12 with 2 boys aged 14 bound and gagged in the back. OMEG is a rumanian fruit firm. the driver after being released was found to have had a forged passport.
    only the other people in the traffic queue witnessed these boys being taken out of the van, no mention appeared in the press.
    for one reason, the PTB want people to think we are witnessing pedophile explosion, its not these boys were being imported to act as male prostitutes
    for the growing homosexual communities.
    until we recognise the dangers and act on it, foreign mafias will continue to exploit.
    BTW such websites as aangirfan edit comments to fit in with their pro homosexual agenda,

  5. tdf

    As the interviewee puts it @2:35 in the above documentary , “a culture of paternalism where the state knew best, the people of the country were not entitled to know what was happening…the standard phrase that was used here was ‘national security’ ”

    What we must do is shine a light into dark places, and I thank this blog for continuing to do so.

  6. Nathaniel J. Harris

    Thank you for this post. Porton Down remains an extremely sinister place.

  7. Charles T.

    Psychopathy. That’s the underlying reason behind all this “callousness” as we perceive it. There are highly reliable and unfakeable tests for this condition, which we should insist all persons wishing to enter politics must undergo before they’re allowed to assume positions of public trust.
    All the while we don’t screen for psychopaths we are openly inviting this kind of abuse against us and our loved ones and it will only get worse over time as they form ever more elaborate networks with like-minded individuals.

  8. Myers

    There is a documentary free online that I recommend for context to this story. It is called ‘Human Resources’ by Scott Noble (Metanoia Films), and although focusing mainly on the history of human experimentation in the US, it reveals the ideological underpinnings of these projects that continue to this day:

  9. arthur billings

    tricia the Nazis introduced very strict protection laws for kids and animals, those with criminal records against kids were put in the work camps, many people say this should be brought back by us

  10. anne

    Doesn’t surprise me either. This was at a time when the government regarded aboriginal Australians and enlisted servicemen expendable too.
    Not intending to deflect the discussion here, rather to reinforce the understanding of institutional callousness.

  11. arthur billings

    tony blairs regime also rubber stamped the drugging of children in experiments the same as thatcher.
    Winston Churchill wanted porton down to build Manchurian candidates
    but one top psychiatrist called prof alexander cannon refused so was imprisoned on the isle of man for the duration of W W II
    my sisters hubands family is related to this man

  12. as in private secret hearings

  13. I wish I could say I was surprised. Those in power are truly evil and no different from the Nazis.

    Gojam it would be really interesting to do a short piece on the family courts. when did it become law that they were private, who supported the law and what BS grounds did they give.


  14. nuggy

    that certanly wouldent suprise

  15. Pingback: Experimenting On Children In Care | Alternative News Network