Savile Abused Hundreds At The BBC.

“The sheer scale of victims’ testimonies being examined has delayed the publication of Smith’s report by a month.”

Of course those running blogs that have become apologists for Jimmy Savile will try to suggest it’s all hokum…


The BBC will be plunged into a major crisis with the publication of a damning review, expected next month, that will reveal its staff turned a blind eye to the rape and sexual assault of up to 1,000 girls and boys byJimmy Savile in the corporation’s changing rooms and studios.

Dame Janet Smith, a former court of appeal judge, who previously led the inquiry into the murders by Dr Harold Shipman, will say in her report that the true number of victims of Savile’s sexual proclivities may never be known but that his behaviour had been recognised by BBC executives who took no action.

Smith’s investigations, which followed the Pollard inquiry into why the BBC shelved a Newsnight programme about Savile, will send shockwaves through the corporation.

A source close to the inquiry told the Observer: “The numbers are shocking. Many hundreds and potentially up to 1,000 people were victims of Savile when he was representing the corporation. The report will overshadow Pollard. It will go right to the heart of how Savile was able to get away with the most heinous of crimes under the very noses of BBC staff for more than 40 years.”

The Guardian


Filed under Abuse, News

14 responses to “Savile Abused Hundreds At The BBC.

  1. Pingback: Savile fed kids to the Royals, facilitated by the BBC

  2. i have already been fined by a magistrates court for not paying tv licence 300 pound there takeing it out of my benefits so much a week both my brother and i was in st williams school for boys god as a question for you all i would like to no is what that question and answer is I have been asked and answerd my question

  3. GMB

    ‘Savile Abused Hundreds At The BBC’ is that the right Order?

  4. matt

    looks like he is sniffing his finger in the photo.

  5. Sweetcheeks

    And remember that BBC have already spent £5m on Savile inquiries.

  6. Needlz

    “Savile Abused Hundreds At The BBC”?

    No shit Sherlock!

  7. wellen dowd

    What you have to remember is that the BBC in fact all of the UK is now run by jews, in jewish law its ok to abuse kids as long as they are not fellow jews, especially boys which is why the gay lobbies were putting so much pressure on investigators not to mention abused boys

    • gw

      You mean Jewish like Chris Patten the roman catholic or Jewish like Mark Thompson who was raised a Jesuit?

    • christine winnan

      since when has it been ok in Jewish law to abuse kids ??? the Rothchilds and his cronies do not constitute thewhole of the Jewish race any more than Judas constituted the 12 apostles !

  8. gw


    But in the words of Chandler Bing:

    “yet – believable”

  9. Lone wolf savile.

    Did it all on his own.

    Nobody else involved.

    Oh other than his mate who organised parties and recently committed “suicide”.

  10. Geoffrey Stansfield

    So for 40 years the BBC allegedly failed to do anything to curb this monster ?
    Or if anyone tried , which this Report should show , if it has been done properly , then others must have been active in some way to engineer a cover -up .
    It is one thing to silently ” turn a blind eye ” .
    But is it not infinitely more serious to become an accessory to the abuse ?

    Does it not appear that the very time scale over which this regularly occurred should therefore produce a veritable army of , effectively , persons willing to do something or other , however slight , to actively aid Saville ?

    Even on the first basis of merely remaining silent , wasn’t it Moliere who said :- ” It is not only what we do , but also what we do not , for which we are accountable ” ?
    Edmund Burke said in ” Reflections on French Revolution 1790 ” , ” All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing ” .

    Why is it , that when so many persons were in authority at the BBC , and had a duty to act , they then failed to do so ?