by | July 31, 2013 · 11:49 pm

Geoffrey Dickens Dossier: Freedom Of Information Request.

Credit must go to GW who put in the FOI request.

5

1

2

3

4

15 Comments

Filed under Abuse, Fernbridge, News, Politics

15 responses to “Geoffrey Dickens Dossier: Freedom Of Information Request.”

  1. chess
    September 9, 2013 at 3:58 pm

    It’s not in the files because it was never MINUTED on ANY file, God forbid the HO, another ‘not fit for purpose’ outfit, should leave any trail of accusations/charges/evidence, let alone information as damning as this would have been to the elite. Strange also that no signatory to the huge public petition that Dickens presented seems to have raised a voice. A million signatures, wasn’t it?

  2. GMB
    September 9, 2013 at 3:08 pm

    Go on gojam run my stuff…redacted of course

  3. Pingback: The Police Now Have The ‘Dear Geoff’ Letter. | theneedleblog

  4. Claire
    August 1, 2013 at 5:52 pm

    Disgusting. Another whitewash. Am appalled.

  5. dpack
    August 1, 2013 at 2:22 pm

    i had wondered how long it would take to not find it.

    mr dickens dropped the matter and is reported as stating he feared for his life and his families lives etc .his family said they destroyed the “insurance” copy after his death as they felt safer not having it.
    shortly after he handed it to the home secretary with witnesses present the story disappeared from the local and national press very rapidly and the last person known to have had it in their hands has said he cannot remember it.
    if it was mistaken or malicious it could have been shown to be invalid at the time if not in public because of the mud sticks to clean things principle at least to mr dickins to satisfy him that all was well in the land.

    it seems likely at least some of mr dickins’s data was a threat to powerful interests.

    q1 who gave him the data that formed the dossier and can they help illuminate what they told him?
    q2 he gave one copy to leon brittan who does not remember it and one was destroyed by his family, did any other copies exist and are they available in full or in part?

  6. martin
    August 1, 2013 at 9:46 am

    The 7 boxes referred to evidence that had been seized when Peter Righton’s home was raided. This was the subject of Tom Watson’s PMQ question and it resulted in Operation Fairbank. > your statement was this a investigation that was STOPPED after just 4 months and the police officers on that case was sent to other police departments or police forces and the files disappeared and found in LEICESTERSHIRE can you confirm the files that were found in Leicestershire had any connection with the FRANK BECK trial ???

  7. zoompad
    August 1, 2013 at 8:18 am

    I know that Staffordshire Pindown has been covered up, the victims persecuted and the Military Security Services and MET are involved in both the cover up and the persecution of victims of institutional child abuse. I know that because I am one of the victims of abuse and reabuse.

  8. iwantthetruth
    August 1, 2013 at 2:26 am

    I have had a totally different response to my FOI request regarding this same subject. I’ll try to get it scanned and forward to you Gojam.

    I have also tried FOI requests for Richmond Child Care services via my MP when Richmond Council refused me information. I was told to write to Richmond Council again …….

  9. stardog23
    August 1, 2013 at 1:13 am

    Those who have any experience in the field of Ufology are sadly, use to this sort of shenanigans. On the surface it looks like all due care was taken procedures all strictly adhered to. Chances are, it’s complete and utter bollocks. I know people who have had departments deny they have even received letters that were signed for In one particular case, where an MP was involved, within 2 weeks of questions being asked in the chamber and, yet more obfuscation by the minister responsible and the questions being tabled again, This time, mysteriously, two Newspapers ran articles mirroring exactly the subject questions had been raised about that, not only ignored the research they themselves had asked for rather, sought to make a joke out of the whole matter. Coincidence of course, I should also point out that. When a Police Chief Superintendent became involved in certain case he was “warned off” by his own line management only after he had threatened to take direct legal action against a government department.

    He should have tried sending a FOIR that covered all police records in the Greater London area pertinent to child abuse and accusations of child abuse in the given period

  10. martin
    August 1, 2013 at 12:56 am

    Please do as this is getting complexed and both events need explaining to me more.

    • gojam
      August 1, 2013 at 1:13 am

      The 7 boxes referred to evidence that had been seized when Peter Righton’s home was raided. This was the subject of Tom Watson’s PMQ question and it resulted in Operation Fairbank.

      This FOI is a request for the evidence dossier that Geoffrey Dickins handed into Leon Brittan (which he can’t remember!)

      I hope that is clear.

  11. martin
    August 1, 2013 at 12:51 am

    ARE THESE FILES THAT WERE FOUND THE SAME FILES THAT TOM WATSON MP SUGGESTED IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS IN 2012 AS HE ALREADY SUGGESTED THE FILES WERE FOUND IN LEICESTERSHIRE CONTAINING 7 BOXES OR ARE THE TWO DIFFERENT EVENTS.

  12. Pingback: Alternative News Network – Geoffrey Dickens Dossier: Freedom Of Information Request.