by | May 3, 2013 · 4:03 pm

Ken Livingstone On Kincora

Published without permission but I hope with this plug I’ll escape his wrath – Livingstone’s Labour by Ken Livingstone can be purchased on Amazon Here

123456

15 Comments

Filed under Abuse, News, Politics

15 responses to “Ken Livingstone On Kincora”

  1. Mr Crow
    July 9, 2014 at 9:47 am

    Reblogged this on The Life & Opinions of Mr Crow and commented:
    Shocking

  2. Pingback: Ken Livingstone On Kincora | L8in

  4. dpack
    May 5, 2013 at 1:08 am

    there is plenty in ken’s account that seems to match other data.

    the events surrounding kincora need full exposure but it is important to remember the primary victims have not had justice yet.

    the range of crimes that the kincora node links to is surprising.

  5. chrisb
    May 3, 2013 at 10:55 pm

    There are further questions: did the IRA really murder Airey Neave ? Mountbatten ?

    • stardog23
      May 4, 2013 at 5:57 pm

      The deaths of Neave and Mountbatten were serendipitous for all sides. The IRA could claim a “prominent target achieved and a success plus, the British establishment could then cast both as heroes when, in their latter years, both Neave and Mountbatten had become liabilities and a PR accident waiting to happen.

      Of course, if as does seem well possible, both executions were merely facilitated by the British security services then, the weight of blame always lies with the actions of the IRA/INLA. The fact is, both the IRA and the British establishment”profited” from the deaths of both people. There is some pretty strong evidence to link both Mountbatten and Neave, to the “coup” that several high ranking Labour politicians have alluded to in their memoires. The received wisdom being that , Mountbatten was the “titular” head of the coup conspirators.

      • Sabre
        May 7, 2013 at 9:42 pm

        The overlap between the security services and PIRA, Sinn Fein, INLA etc is not very widely appreciated. The ISU or Nutting Squad of the PIRA was staffed by UK special forces infiltrators and SB/FRU informers.

        J118 ?

  6. andy llewellyn (@andyllewellyn3)
    May 3, 2013 at 7:13 pm

    Very murky barrel with a nasty smell at the botton, sound a bit like how the waterhouse enquire’s and and dunblane, extremely disturbing.

  7. incubusblog
    May 3, 2013 at 6:09 pm

    Airey Neave, hero of Colditz, and thorough-going b*stard. The last part is particularly illuminating in light of recent events; Security Services planning ‘terror outrages’ to justify repression, much like the Gladio Network on the continent, still, if you need and want to protect your wealth and privilege from the great unwashed to preserve the Empire and ‘civilisation’ and stave off the ‘foul baboonery of bolshevism’ (as Churchill the Strikebreaker called it), then I guess anything goes- including mass murder and the rape of children etc.

    • Sabre
      May 8, 2013 at 5:56 pm

      The staving off of the foul baboonery of Bolshevism , responsible for millions of murders and not a few rapes of the innocent, was at least a worthy cause.

  8. gus brown
    May 3, 2013 at 6:03 pm

    You do have to wonder what chance we have of identifying those who have abused so many children for so many years when you read stuff like this, not much it would seem.

  9. nuggy
    May 3, 2013 at 5:18 pm

    makes me wonder weather the heath stuff is actually true.

    could it be another one of there dark ops

    maybe heath wasn’t a pervert at all.

    • stardog23
      May 3, 2013 at 7:06 pm

      I’ve posted elsewhere about Heath and the dirty tricks surrounding him. The main “witness” that backs the Heath claims up happens to be an ex SBS solider. One can draw their own conclusions from that fact.

      On a side note, I would mention that, in the late 1970s there was a whole cadre of ex military and diplomatic people involved in the filed of Ufology. They had drawn the conclusion that, UFOs were piloted and created by “demons” and that, they constituted a direct threat to “national security”.. These included such people as Lord Hill-Norton and quite possibly Lord Mountbatten,. In short, they believed the whole “counter culture” to be some sort of “demonic plot”. Members of clergy, including some sitting in the House of Lords, tried to push an agenda through based on this premise. There’s a whole detailed article in the Fortean Times about it all.

      http://www.forteantimes.com/features/articles/95/flying_saucers_from_hell.html

      You might well ask what this has to do with child abuse and political chicanery however, some names seem to crop up with remarkable consistency from subject to subject. Lord Louis Mountbatten, being the most celebrated.
      Let me put it another way. when it comes to conspiracies, they were everywhere and many movers and shakers, right up to the royal family, were absolutely convinced of their existence. The moment the Warsaw Pact collapsed,, the word conspiracy, became linked with derision and paranoia
      .

  10. Pingback: Alternative News Network – Ken Livingstone On Kincora

  11. dpack
    May 3, 2013 at 4:20 pm

    wow thanks ,maybe im not deluded or paranoid.